Profile Picture
  • All
  • Search
  • Images
  • Videos
  • Maps
  • News
  • Copilot
  • More
    • Shopping
    • Flights
    • Travel
  • Notebook
  • Top stories
  • Sports
  • U.S.
  • Local
  • World
  • Science
  • Technology
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • More
    Politics
Order byBest matchMost fresh
  • Any time
    • Past hour
    • Past 24 hours
    • Past 7 days
    • Past 30 days

Supreme Court ‘skeptical’ of mail-in ballots that arrive

Digest more
Top News
Overview
For context
 · 5h
Supreme Court appears skeptical of laws counting mail-in ballots after Election Day
At the Supreme Court Monday, the conservative majority seemed ready to overturn laws in 29 states that allow mail-in votes to be counted after Election Day if they were postmarked by Election Day.

Continue reading

 · 1d
Supreme Court seems skeptical of allowing states to accept late-arriving mail ballots
 · 1d
Mississippi mail in ballots case heard by the Supreme Court Monday
 · 1d
Supreme Court shows support for Trump push to limit mail-in ballots
The Supreme Court could back a Republican effort to stop states from counting late-arriving mail-in ballots, a decision that would be a win for President Donald Trump and would lead to stricter voting...

Continue reading

 · 1d
The Latest: Supreme Court Will Decide Whether States Can Keep Counting Late Mail Ballots
 · 11h
Behind the Supreme Court arguments on the mail-in ballots case
 · 1d
Supreme Court hearing dispute today over late-arriving mail ballots
Before the Supreme Court is Mississippi's law, which allows mail ballots that are received up to five days after the election to be counted as long as they were postmarked by Election Day.

Continue reading

 · 12h
Map Shows States Where Supreme Court Could Change Mail-in Ballots
 · 1d
SCOTUS conservatives signal readiness on curbing late-arriving mail ballots

Supreme Court, asylum seekers

Digest more
Top News
Overview
Impacts
SCOTUSblog · 3h
Court appears likely to side with Trump administration on rights of asylum seekers
The Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared likely to uphold the federal government’s policy of systematically turning back asylum seekers before they can reach the U.S. border with Mexico. During roughly

Continue reading

 · 2h · on MSN
Supreme Court to decide if migrants turned away at border can seek asylum in the US
 · 3h · on MSN
The Supreme Court seems willing to make things even harder for asylum seekers
 · 3h
Lawyers speak after Supreme Court considers reviving restrictive immigration asylum policy
The Supreme Court grappled Tuesday with an immigration policy that has been used to turn back migrants seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border and whether the Trump administration should be able to r...

Continue reading

 · 6h
Trump Administration Live Updates: Republicans Consider Plan to Fund Homeland Security Dept.
 · 8h
Supreme Court justices lean toward Trump in asylum-processing case
 · 1d
US judge blocks Trump administration from detaining thousands of refugees
Plaintiffs argue policy misinterprets law, risking unnecessary detention

Continue reading

 · 1d
Judge blocks Trump from deporting Abrego Garcia to Liberia, extending legal standoff
 · 1d
Immigration court bond hearings plummet amid Trump detention policy, analysis finds
Raw Story on MSN
5h

Supreme Court sends major signal in Trump's immigration crackdown

The Supreme Court appeared willing to consider the Trump administration's request to block asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border, according to reports on Tuesday. The Supreme Court decision could give President Donald Trump and his administration the right to bring back a 2016 policy when the federal government turned away immigrants claiming
3hon MSN

'Can't be the standard': NKY church takes 'shrine zoning fight' to Supreme Court

A Northern Kentucky church is asking the United States Supreme Court to step in after it says it was denied the right to build a shrine on its property.
Mother Jones
9h

The Case That Could Upend Who Gets to Be an American Is Back at the Supreme Court

In a brief to the Supreme Court, the administration argues that the amendment—ratified in 1868 in repudiation of the Dred Scott decision that declared Black Americans couldn’t be citizens—specifically intended to extend citizenship to the children of former slaves and their descendants,
Opinion
12hOpinion

The ugly history behind Trump’s birthright citizenship case in the Supreme Court

The peculiar legal argument behind Trump’s attack on citizenship was invented by 19th-century anti-Chinese racists.
Orange County Register
14d

Is it typical for the president to lambast the United States Supreme Court? Ask the Lawyer

A: The First Amendment’s freedom of expression is alive and well. It is not unusual for a U.S. president to express criticism of specific decisions made by the Supreme Court. The tone, nature and extent of the criticism, however, can vary. For example ...
3don MSN

Will the majority-Catholic Supreme Court listen to the church on immigration?

The Catholic Church has been unusually critical of the Trump administration's immigration tactics. Now, it's trying to get the Supreme Court on its side.
  • Privacy
  • Terms